Age (month) | Injury | AIS (Head) | Outcome | Length of hospital stay | Sequelae | Bicycle operator | Position of other children riding together | Circumstance of injury | Collision with other vehicles | Method of carrying infant | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | Epidural hematoma, parietal bone fracture | 2 | ICU | 3 days | − | Mother | Front and back seats | Traveling | Bicycle | Front | |
5 | Subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion, parietal bone fracture | 3 | ICU | 13 days | Partial paralysis | Mother | Back seat | Traveling | Car | Back | |
5 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Back seat | When dismounting | − | Front | |
6 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Unknown | Traveling | − | Front | |
7 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Unknown | Traveling | − | Front | |
7 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Unknown | Traveling | Bicycle | Front | |
9 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Unknown | Traveling | Bicycle | Front | |
10 | Minor head injury | 1 | Discharged | − | − | Mother | Unknown | Traveling | Bicycle | Front |
Method of carrying infant | Attempt | Maximum acceleration [G] | HIC | Maximum impact load [N] | Percentage relative to 95% risk of skull injury (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Back | 1st | 599 | 6,489 | 6,984 | 272 |
2nd | 632 | 6,627 | Not measurable | Not calculable | |
3rd | 449 | 3,901 | 8,920 | 347 | |
4th | 404 | 2,998 | Not measurable | Not calculable | |
Front | 1st | 61 | 118 | 5,801 | 226 |
2nd | 58 | 151 | Not measurable | Not calculable | |
3rd | 40 | 53 | 7,103 | 276 |
Helmet for infants | Highly adhesive baby carrier | Child seat for infants | Bicycle trailers | Passage of regulations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strengths | Development is feasible based on the current designs for child helmets. | Development is feasible based on the current designs for baby carriers. | Development is feasible based on the current designs for child seats. | Commonly used overseas and minimally affects riding instability | Most effective for injury prevention |
Weaknesses | Risk of increasing cervical spine instability and airway compression in infants | Risk of load increase from the parent’s trunk on the infant at the time of the fall | Heavy reinforcement of the device may increase instability during bicycle riding. | Insufficient bicycle roads in Japan | Might deprive parents with a young child of their means of transport (i.e., compensatory strategies are needed) |
Opportunities | Potential to develop a new technology for product creation | Potential to develop a new technology for product creation | Potential to develop a new technology for product creation | Potential to develop a new market for this product | Can aid child care if compensatory measures are provided |
Threats | Incorrect use of the product can be harmful to infants (e.g., airway compression) | Use of the carrier is complicated. Also, incorrect use may cause harm to infants (e.g., compromised chest wall movement) | Instability may increase the risk of accidents. | Insufficient bicycle parking spaces in Japan | Caregivers’ objections and financial issues |