Table 1-a. Overview of the Studies Describing Demographic Features of the Patients in Emergency Departments of Each Facility.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

Author Year Study duration Study type Location Definition of “foreigners” Population
24 Takashina et al. 2017 January 2011―December 2015 Retrospective review of medical records and accounting data Kyoto definition of “visitors” Provided “Visitors” that visited or were referred to the emergency department
25 Taguchi et al 2018 April 2012―March 2016 Retrospective review of medical records Hokkaido Not provided Foreign patients
26 Oshita et al 2019 April 2015―March 2018 Retrospective review of medical records Yamanashi Not provided Foreign visitors
27 Kainuma et al 2019 April 2014―March 2019 Retrospective review of medical records Osaka Not provided Foreign patients
28 Suzaki et al. 2019 April―September 2017 Retrospective review of medical records Tokyo Not provided Foreign patients visiting the primary and secondary emergency department for the first time
29 Nakazawa et al. 2020 January 2014―December 2018 Retrospective review of medical records Okinawa Not provided Pregnant foreign patients in a single emergency department
30 Shimoyama et al. 2020 April 2015―March 2018 Retrospective review of medical records Tokyo Not provided Foreign patients transported to a tertiary care center
31 Aoki et al. 2022 April 2018―March 2020 Retrospective review of medical records Nagano Not provided Foreign patients transported to a tertiary care center
32 Ishii et al. 2022 January 2010―December 2019 Retrospective review of medical records Tokyo Visual classification of patient names Foreign patients transported to a tertiary care center
Table 1-b. Outcome, Severity, and the Time of Visit of Foreign Patients Defined in Each Study.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

Author Year Outcome Transportation Visits
Total patients
(included in the study) Hospitalized Deaths Walk-in Ambulance Air transport During daytime During evenings During nights
24 Takashina et al. 2017 1059 46 (4%) 1 (0%) 744 (70%) 314 (30%) 0 - - -
25 Taguchi et al 2018 132 - - - 132 (100%) - 53 (40%) 49 (37%) 30 (33%)
26 Oshita et al 2019 474 - 1 (0%) 380 (80%) 93 (20%) 1 205 (43%) 269 (57%) -
27 Kainuma et al 2019 198 13 (7%) 3 (2%) 56 (28%) 142 (72%) 0 142 (71%) 56 (29%)
28 Suzaki et al. 2019 158 3 (2%) 0 131 (83%) 27 (17%) 0 110 (70%) 48 (30%)
29 Nakazawa et al. 2020 37 4 (11%) 0 - - - 15 (41%) 11 (30%) 11 (30%)
30 Shimoyama et al. 2020 87 55 (63%) 25 (29%) - - - - - -
31 Aoki et al. 2022 777 71 (9%) 1 (0%) 660 (85%) 106 (14%) 11 (1.4%) 405 (52%) 262 (34%) 110 (14.2%)
32 Ishii et al. 2022 325 - 27 (8.3%) - - - - - -
Table 1-c. The Nationality of the Patients Reported in Each Study.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

Author Year Nationality
Asia Europe Oceania North America Latin America Others Unknown
24 Takashina et al. 2017 477 (45%) 201 (19%) 85 (8%) 148 (14%) 0 169 0
25 Taguchi et al 2018 84 (64%) 3 (2%) - - - 0 25
26 Oshita et al 2019 369 (78%) 42 (9%) 24 (5%) 34 (7%) 1 (2%) 0 4
27 Kainuma et al 2019 157 (79%) 23 (12%) 11 (6%) 6 (3%) 0 1 0
28 Suzaki et al. 2019 123 (78%) 8 (5%) 0 12 (8%) 0 15 0
29 Nakazawa et al. 2020 32 (86%) 0 2 (5%) 2 (3%) 1 (3%) 0 0
30 Shimoyama et al. 2020 51 (74%) 6 (9%) 4 (6%) 5 (7%) 0 7 18
31 Aoki et al. 2022 - - - - - - -
32 Ishii et al. 2022 - - - - - - -
Table 1-d. Diagnosis of Diseases Foreign Patients Presented within the Emergency Departments.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

Author Year Disease
Infectious Others/
Injury Urology OBGYN Pediatrics Neurology GI Cardiovascular Respiratory ENT diseases Toxicology unspecified
24 Takashina et al. 2017 295 (28%) 106 (10%) 21 (2%) - 21 (2%) 164 (16%) 32 (3%) 202 (20%) 32 (3%) 169
25 Taguchi et al 2018 46 (35%) 5 (4%) - - - 26 (20%) - 11 (8%) - - 12 (9%) 32
26 Oshita et al 2019 166 (35%) 22 (5%) 21 (4%) 64 (14%) 168 (35%) - - - - - - 33
27 Kainuma et al 2019 72(36%) 5 (2%) - - 15(8%) 32(16%) 21(11%) 8(4%) 14 (7%) - - 31
28 Suzaki et al. 2019 19 (12%) 4 (3%) 0 0 4 (3%) 21 (13%) 2 (1%) 3 (2%) 3 (2%) 37 (23%) 92
29 Nakazawa et al. 2020 - - 37 (100%) - - - - - - - - -
30 Shimoyama et al. 2020 16 (18%) 4 (5%) 37 (31%) 3 (4%) 12 (14%) 24
31 Aoki et al. 2022 263 (33.9%) 47 (6.0%) - - - 52 (67%) - 114 (14.7%) - 65 (8.4%) - 56
32 Ishii et al. 2022 73 (21.8%) 0 - - 14 (4.3%) 56 (17.2%) 73 (22.4%) 16 (4.9%) - 17 (5.2%) 28 (8.6%) 48
Table 1-e. Information on Payments by Foreign Patients and the Key Findings of Each Study.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

# Author Year Payment Key findings
Outstanding
Fee (JPY) expenses
24 Takashina et al. 68,000/outpatient,
745,000/inpatient, Children accounted for 19.3% of the patients.
2017 174500/day/person 1% of total Many emergency transports were mild cases, and hospitalization was short at the average of 9.7 days.
25 Taguchi et al 2018 - - Cultural differences, linguistics, and religions posed as problems when dealing with foreign patients.
Dealing with foreign patients requires a comprehensive approach with medical and non-medical staff.
26 Oshita et al 2019 - - There are differences in the needs of foreign patients between each location.
Whether patients understand translational devices are unknown.
Some required hospitalizations but refused; whether this is due to linguistic problems remains difficult to evaluate.
Passport documentations and death certificates for other countries posed as difficulties.
27 Kainuma et al 2019 108,000 ± 453,340 6 (3%) Communication was mainly possible with the usage of interpreting device.
Unpaid medical expenses became a problem although many tourists had travel insurance.
28 Suzaki et al. 2019 - 3 (2%) Infectious diseases, which were of common diseases, were also common among foreign patients.
Primary and secondary emergency departments also had a high number of injuries.
Some cases included several refusals of other medical facilities.
Eight percent of patients with residency in Japan did not have a national healthcare insurance.
29 Nakazawa et al. 2020 - - Difficulty was found in retrieving information on the gynecological status of patients from other countries.
Arrival in ambulances was common among foreign patients than Japanese patients.
30 Shimoyama et al. 2020 1,0009,735/case 13 (15%) Forty-two percent of the patients were covered with a Japanese public healthcare insurance.
Fifty-four percent of the cases required linguistic assistance, but professional interpreting was provided in only one case.
Difficulty was found in gaining informed consent and planning international transfers.
31 Aoki et al. 2022 - - Language used when treating the patients was associated with length of stay in the emergency department.
32 Ishii et al. 2022 - - Anaphylaxis, burn, and infectious disease diagnoses were more common among non-Japanese patients.
No statistical significance was found in mortality rates or mean lengths of stay with stratification on language or disorientation of the CNS.
Table 2. Overview of the Longitudinal and Qualitative Studies in the Review.

From: Foreign Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Studies in Japan

# Author Year Duration Study type Location Population Definition of “foreigners” Outcome Key findings
33 Katayama et al 2016 Jan–Dec 2013 Retrospective study of EMS records Osaka City Patients using ambulances in Osaka City Not defined Characteristics of patients who experienced difficulty in hospital acceptance at the scene by emergency medical service personnel Being a foreign patient was associated with difficulty in hospital acceptance at scene
Difficulty may have occurred due to lack of multilingual staff in hospitals of Osaka
34 Kishi et al. 2018 Jan 10–July 31, 2018 Survey Osaka Pref. Hospitals with emergency departments in Osaka Prefecture Not defined Concerns when treating a foreign patient Seventy-one percent of the facilities had difficulty as they had no interpreter. Thirty-eight percent of the hospitals experienced outstanding accounts.
35 Kishi et al. 2020 Jan 10–Dec 28, 2018 Survey Osaka Pref. Hospitals with emergency departments in Osaka Prefecture Not defined Concerns when treating a foreign patient Seventy-two percent of the facilities had difficulty as they had no interpreter. Thirty-six percent of the hospitals experienced outstanding accounts. Issues regarding the patients’ perception toward medicine, religion, diet, and patient transfers arose as new problems in hospitals.
36 Beppu et al. 2020 2017.7–2018.1 Interview Tokyo Foreign patients over 20 years old that did not speak Japanese in an emergency department Not provided Pain, cultural difficulties, communication difficulties, worries on reoccurrence of the symptoms, and worries on payment were noted as difficulties. Physical difficulties are more critical in emergency departments compared to the Japanese. Difficulties change during the clinical course.
PAGE TOP