Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients Intubated in the ICU with and without Life-Sustaining Treatment Limitation, Stratified by Survival, and Tracheostomy Status.

From: Post Hoc Analysis of Frailty and Tracheostomy Risk in Older Patients Intubated and in an Intensive Care Unit in Japan: An Inverse Association in Older Patients with Advanced Age

Survivors and non-survivors without life-sustaining treatment limitationa Survivors with life-sustaining treatment limitation
Non-tracheostomy (n = 227) Tracheostomy (n = 70) Non-tracheostomy (n = 42) Tracheostomy (n = 24)
Individual-level characteristics
 Mean age (year) ± SD 78.1±6.8 84.4±8.8 81.1±5.7 90.1±4.7
 Sex, male, n (%) 146 (64.3) 41 (87.2) 33 (78.6) 1 (4.2)
 CCI, median (IQR) 4 (3-6) 5 (5-7) 6 (5-6) 8 (7-8)
 APACHE, II score, median (IQR) 24 (13-31) 23 (15-33) 27 (22-32) 27 (22-36)
 ICU admission categoryb, n (%)
  Cardiology 41 (18.1) 23 (32.9) 4 (9.5) 0 (0)
  Pulmonary 37 (16.3) 27 (28.6) 7 (16.7) 3 (12.5)
  Gastrointestinal 46 (20.3) 1 (1.4) 1 (2.4) 0 (0)
  Neurology 65 (28.6) 7 (10) 24 (57.1) 20 (83.3)
  Trauma 19 (8.4) 11 (15.7) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  Endocrine 7 (3.1) 0 (0) 3 (7.1) 0 (0)
  Skin/tissue 2 (0.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  Urology 2 (0.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  Others 8 (3.5) 1 (1.4) 3 (7.1) 1 (4.2)
 ICU length of stay (days), median (IQR) 4 (3-9) 13 (8-15) 3 (3-9) 15 (11-15)
 Major comorbidities, n (%)
  Dementia 69 (30.4) 27 (38.6) 12 (28.7) 2 (8.3)
  Congestive heart failure 30 (13.2) 2 (2.9) 1 (2.4) 1 (4.2)
  Chronic pulmonary disease 14 (6.2) 23 (32.9) 4 (9.5) 22 (91.7)
  Malignancy 17 (7.5) 5 (7.1) 3 (7.1) 20 (83.3)
 cCFS score, n (%)
1 19 (8.4) 5 (7.1) 0 (0) 0 (0)
2 56 (24.7) 21 (30) 3 (7.1) 0 (0)
3 34 (15) 32 (45.7) 24 (57.1) 0 (0)
4 52 (22.9) 5 (7.1) 3 (7.1) 1 (4.2)
5 32 (14.1) 1 (1.4) 0 (0) 1 (4.2)
6 7 (3.1) 3 (4.3) 4 (9.5) 22 (91.7)
7 26 (11.5) 2 (2.9) 6 (14.3) 0 (0)
8 1 (0.4) 1 (1.4) 2 (4.8) 0 (0)
Table 2. Risk of Tracheostomy by Clinically Evident Frailty in the Survivors Intubated in the ICU both with and without Treatment Limitations, in addition to Non-Survivors in ICU without Treatment Limitations (n = 363)a in Different Cutoffs of CFS (CFS4 and CFS 5).

From: Post Hoc Analysis of Frailty and Tracheostomy Risk in Older Patients Intubated and in an Intensive Care Unit in Japan: An Inverse Association in Older Patients with Advanced Age

Tracheostomy case/n (%) Risk ratio (95% CI) for tracheostomy
Crude Adjustedb
CFS score ≥4 36/169 (21.3%) 0.71 (0.5-1.02) 0.4 (0.27-0.61)
CFS score <4 58/194 (29.9%) Reference Reference
CFS score ≥5 30/108 (27.8%) 1.11 (0.76-1.6) 0.49 (0.31-0.79)
CFS score <5 64/255 (25.1%) Reference Reference
Table 3. Risk of Tracheostomy by Clinically Evident Frailty in the Survivors Intubated in the ICU both with and without Treatment Limitations, in addition to Non-Survivors in the ICU without Treatment Limitations, Stratified by Age Group in Different Frailty Cutoffs (CFS4 and CFS 5)a.

From: Post Hoc Analysis of Frailty and Tracheostomy Risk in Older Patients Intubated and in an Intensive Care Unit in Japan: An Inverse Association in Older Patients with Advanced Age

Tracheostomy case/n (%)b Risk ratio (95% CI) for tracheostomy
Crude Adjustedc
Age ≥75 CFS score ≥4 33/147 (22.4%) 0.62 (0.43-0.9) 0.32 (0.2-0.5)
Age ≥75 CFS score <4 53/146 (36.3%) Reference Reference
Age <75 CFS score ≥4 3/22 (13.6%) 1.31 (0.34-5.05)
Age <75 CFS score <4 5/48 (10.4%) Reference
Age ≥75 CFS score ≥5 57/193 (29.5%) 0.98 (0.67-1.43) 0.39 (0.23-0.67)
Age ≥75 CFS score <5 29/100 (29.0%) Reference Reference
Age <75 CFS score ≥5 1/8 (12.5%) 1.11 (0.15-7.99)
Age <75 CFS score <5 7/62 (11.3%) Reference
PAGE TOP