Original Research Article

Neighborhood Environments and Healthy Life Expectancy in Older Adults: A 6-year Longitudinal Cohort Study Based on Data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study

Rikuya Hosokawa1, Toshiyuki Ojima2, Tomoya Myojin3, Jun Aida4, Katsunori Kondo5,6,7, and Naoki Kondo8
1Department of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
2Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
3Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
4Department of Oral Health Promotion, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
5Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
6Center for Well-being and Society, Nihon Fukushi University, Aichi, Japan
7Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
8School of Public Health and Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Corresponding author: Rikuya Hosokawa, hosokawa.rikuya.4r@kyoto-u.ac.jp

DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0154

Received: October 3, 2023
Accepted: March 11, 2024
Advance Publication: June 24, 2024
Published: July 16, 2024

Cite this article as:
Hosokawa R, Ojima T, Myojin T, Aida J, Kondo K, Kondo N. Neighborhood Environments and Healthy Life Expectancy in Older Adults: A 6-year Longitudinal Cohort Study Based on Data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. JMA J. 2024;7(3):328-333.

Abstract

Introduction: A well-established association exists between health and neighborhood land use patterns, including parks, roads, and other physical environments, also called the built environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that the built environment influences health, particularly among older populations, because the scope of activities in such populations is limited. Herein, we investigated the association between specific neighborhood environments and the healthy life expectancy of older individuals.

Methods: Data at two time points (2013 and 2019) from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study were used in this study. The study comprised a sample of 8,956 residents aged ≥65 years who were not certified for long-term care. Information on the presence or absence of eight types of neighborhood environments was collected using a questionnaire. A multistate life table analysis was conducted to determine the association between perceived neighborhood environments and healthy life expectancy.

Results: Significant differences were observed in the “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” category. The group that perceived “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” had an approximately 1.2-year longer healthy life expectancy than the group that did not perceive such parks and sidewalks. In addition, individuals who lived within walking distance of a park were more physically active than those who did not.

Conclusions: Safe, walkable neighborhoods with excellent parks may encourage physical activity among older adults and extend their healthy lifespan. Future research is warranted to identify the underlying mechanisms.

Key words: Neighborhood environment, Healthy life expectancy, Older adults, Physical activity, Walking

Introduction

Neighborhood environments affect health, and a well-established association exists between health and neighborhood land use practices, including those involving parks, streets, and other built environments. A previous study on the impact of neighborhood environment on health reported an association between built environments and physical activity (1). Regular physical activity provides numerous health benefits, including prevention, improvement, and reduction in the mortality risk of chronic diseases, such as heart diseases, diabetes, cancer, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and depression (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7). Thus, physical activity is associated with healthy life expectancy and not merely increased life expectancy. However, majority of the Japanese people do not engage in regular physical activity (8). Therefore, public health research should explore factors associated with increased levels of physical activity.

Japanese people have a long life expectancy; however, they do not always have a good quality of life or a healthy life. A longer life expectancy is associated with a higher risk of disease and disability before death (9), (10). Furthermore, aging places growing demands on the economy and social institutions. Hence, effective strategies to promote longer and healthier lives are imperative. Japan’s national health promotion movement, “Healthy Japan 21 (Phase 2),” initiated in 2013, has two main goals: to extend healthy life expectancy and to reduce health disparities (11). Healthy life expectancy refers to the duration of life spent without any health-related restriction on daily activities.

Neighborhood environments may also be associated with healthy life expectancy. Most previous studies on neighborhood-built environments, physical activity, and health were cross-sectional; moreover, a reverse causality exists that healthy older adults who prefer physical activity choose to live in environments that promote physical activity (12). Although the specific neighborhood environment associated with healthy life expectancy remains unclear, housing density, road connectivity, and land use mix seem to be important factors that are associated with healthy life expectancy (13), (14).

Thus, this study determined whether healthy life expectancy in older adults was associated with specific neighborhood environments in Japan. We utilized data from a 6-year follow-up period (2013 to 2019 waves) to identify specific neighborhood environments associated with healthy life expectancy.

Materials and Methods

Participants

In this study, we utilized national longitudinal cohort data collected by the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) in 2013 and 2019 (15), (16). The study included individuals aged ≥65 years who did not require long-term care and residing in 19 municipalities in 9 of the 47 prefectures in Japan. Self-administered questionnaires were used for the survey. The major survey items included questions regarding the neighborhood environment. Among the 13,662 residents who provided valid responses to the items related to limited activities of daily living in the 2013 survey, 4,846 provided valid responses in the 2019 survey. In addition, we incorporated data from 2,343 participants who were certified as requiring long-term care in the survey conducted in 2019 and 1,767 participants who died between 2013 and 2019. Finally, 8,956 residents were included in the study.

Exposure: neighborhood environment

The participants were asked about their perceptions toward the neighborhood environment around their homes. The question “How many of the following places are within walking distance (roughly 1 km) of your house?” included five negative aspects, such as “places with graffiti and trash,” “roads and intersections with traffic accident hazards,” “dangerous places to walk alone at night,” and “places where it is difficult to walk (hills and steps),” and four positive aspects, such as “parks and sidewalks,” “attractive views and buildings,” “fresh food stores,” and “houses and facilities for casual drop-ins.” A 5-point scale was used for each aspect with the following responses: “a lot,” “some,” “a little,” “none,” and “do not know.” These five responses were dichotomized into yes (a lot, some) and no (a little, none, do not know). The eight types of perceived neighborhood environments were used as independent variables (17).

Outcome: healthy and unhealthy life expectancy

Healthy life expectancy was computed employing the multistate life table method using the SAS Stochastic Population Analysis for Complex Events (SPACE) (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA) software (18). The SPACE program comprises SAS, SAS/IML, and SAS/Connect, and its technical details have been provided elsewhere (18). In our analysis, the Markov transition model of disability and mortality encompassed three states: two nonabsorbed states (nondisability and disability capacity) and one absorbed state (death). Four health status transitions were considered, namely, nondisabled to disabled (disability), disabled to nondisabled (recovery from disability), nondisabled to dead, and disabled to dead. These transitions were based on changes from 2013 (baseline) to 2019 (follow-up), where individuals with no disability were classified as healthy and those with disability as unhealthy. On the basis of this estimated transition rate, the healthy life expectancy at 65 years was calculated for men and women. Considering the aging population, a long-term care insurance (LTCI) system was introduced in Japan (19), (20). In this study, disability was determined based on the responses to questions regarding disability in daily living at baseline and follow-up, whereas data on the need for LTCI care were collected from municipalities. Death was identified using data from municipalities.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Nihon Fukushi University (approval number: 13-14), Chiba University (approval number: 2493), and the National Institute for Longevity Sciences (approval number: 992-3). The study protocol adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants were informed that their participation was voluntary and that completing the questionnaire, selecting the consent checkbox, and returning the questionnaire via mail implied consent to participate. We considered the return of a completed questionnaire as consent for participation in both the baseline and follow-up surveys. Information on the LTCI certification status and death was also confirmed after obtaining the written consent.

Statistical analyses

The changes in healthy life expectancy based on the presence or absence of eight types of neighborhood environments were explored using a multistate life table. Furthermore, the association between the neighborhood environment and physical activity was examined using the χ2 test, where p <.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

At baseline, the data of 8,956 participants (4,348 men and 4,608 women) were included in the analysis. The perceptions of neighborhood environments across sexes are presented in Table 1. The healthy life expectancies at 65 years in men and women were 16.18 (standard deviation [SD] 0.20) and 16.97 (SD 0.22) years, respectively.

Table 1. Perceptions of Neighborhood Environment Types by Sex.

Men (n = 4348) Women (n = 4608)
n % n % p
Locations with graffiti or garbage        
 Present 1100 25.3 890 19.3 <.001
 Absent 3248 74.7 3718 80.7
Roads/crossroads with risk of traffic accidents        
 Present 2782 64.0 2721 59.0 <.001
 Absent 1566 36.0 1887 41.0
Dangerous places for walking alone at night        
 Present 2313 53.2 2611 56.7 <.001
 Absent 2035 46.8 1997 43.3
Locations unamenable to walking (hills or steps)        
 Present 1479 34.0 1617 35.1 .285
 Absent 2869 66.0 2991 64.9
Access to parks and sidewalks        
 Present 3245 74.6 3240 70.3 <.001
 Absent 1103 25.4 1368 29.7
Fascinating views or buildings        
 Present 1563 35.9 1822 39.5 <.001
 Absent 2785 64.1 2786 60.5
Access to fresh food stores        
 Present 3313 76.2 3310 71.8 <.001
 Absent 1035 23.8 1298 28.2
Houses or facilities where you feel free to drop in        
 Present 1531 35.2 1692 36.7 .137
 Absent 2817 64.8 2916 63.3

Table 2 and 3 present the association between the neighborhood environment within walking distance (generally within 1 km) of men’s and women’s homes and healthy life expectancies, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the item “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking.” Participants who perceived the existence of “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” had longer healthy life expectancies―longer by 1.31 and 1.32 years in men and women, respectively―than those who did not.

Table 2. Association between a Neighborhood Environment within Walking Distance (Generally within 1 km) of Men’s Homes and Healthy Life Expectancy.

Years 95% CI
Locations with graffiti or garbage    
 Present 16.38 15.56 17.20
 Absent 16.06 15.59 16.53
Roads/crossroads with risk of traffic accidents    
 Present 16.25 15.75 16.74
 Absent 16.17 15.50 16.84
Dangerous places for walking alone at night    
 Present 16.37 15.83 16.90
 Absent 15.89 15.33 16.46
Locations unamenable to walking (hills or steps)    
 Present 15.90 15.25 16.56
 Absent 16.26 15.78 16.74
Access to parks and sidewalks    
 Present 16.50 16.05 16.96
 Absent 15.19 14.43 15.95
Fascinating views or buildings    
 Present 16.51 15.85 17.17
 Absent 15.89 15.41 16.37
Access to fresh food stores    
 Present 16.47 16.06 16.89
 Absent 15.38 14.52 16.24
Houses or facilities where you feel free to drop in    
 Present 16.16 15.49 16.83
 Absent 16.26 15.77 16.75
Bold numbering indicates a significant difference, with men who had access to parks having significantly longer life expectancy than men who did not have access to parks.
CI, confidence interval

Table 3. Association between a Neighborhood Environment within Walking Distance (Generally within 1 km) of Women’s Homes and Healthy Life Expectancy.

Years 95% CI
Locations with graffiti or garbage    
 Present 17.05 16.14 17.96
 Absent 16.99 16.51 17.48
Roads/crossroads with risk of traffic accidents    
 Present 17.12 16.56 17.69
 Absent 16.80 16.13 17.47
Dangerous places for walking alone at night    
 Present 17.25 16.71 17.78
 Absent 16.61 15.93 17.29
Locations unamenable to walking (hills or steps)    
 Present 16.89 16.22 17.56
 Absent 17.12 16.58 17.66
Access to parks and sidewalks    
 Present 17.39 16.88 17.89
 Absent 16.07 15.27 16.86
Fascinating views or buildings    
 Present 17.42 16.68 18.15
 Absent 16.74 16.16 17.31
Access to fresh food stores    
 Present 17.00 16.56 17.45
 Absent 16.46 15.62 17.29
Houses or facilities where you feel free to drop in    
 Present 17.67 17.01 18.33
 Absent 16.67 16.10 17.23
Bold numbering indicates a significant difference, with women who had access to parks having significantly longer life expectancy than women who did not have access to parks.
CI, confidence interval

Furthermore, when the association between “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” and physical activity was examined (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), participants who perceived the existence of “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” were more likely to be physically active.

Discussion

This study investigated the association between perceived neighborhood environments and healthy life expectancy using data from the JAGES 2013 to 2019 wave. It focused on the Japanese population aged 65 years and above, aiming to contribute to the development of a healthy and long-lived society. When examining the association between the neighborhood environment and healthy life expectancy, significant differences were observed in the variable “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking.” Participants who perceived “parks and sidewalks suitable for exercise and walking” had a longer healthy life expectancy than those who did not.

Significant sex differences were observed in the perception of buildings in the neighborhood. This could be attributed to the underlying differences in each sex’s interest in and use of the building. Variables associated with a negative neighborhood environment, including areas with graffiti and rubbish, streets and intersections posing traffic accident risks, places considered dangerous to walk alone at night, and places considered difficult to walk in (slopes and steps), were included as options but were not associated with healthy life expectancy. Contrarily, the neighborhood environment variable that improved healthy life expectancy in this study was access to parks and sidewalks. This result may be overinterpreted because active individuals are likely to perceive their environment differently than inactive individuals. Previous studies have demonstrated that older adults living near parks exercise more frequently (21), (22). In the present study, perceived proximity to parks was also positively associated with physical activity. A decline in physical activity among older adults is a risk factor for long-term care need and is an important public health concern. Furthermore, lack of physical activity and exercise contributes to declining physical health.

This study has the following strengths: First, it is a large survey study encompassing 9 prefectures and 22 municipalities in Japan. Second, data were collected from two time points, accounting for time factors. However, this study also has some limitations that need to be acknowledged. First, this study was based on a subjective assessment of the characteristics of the neighborhood environment. However, incorporating objective indicators complementing a subjective evaluation may enable a more detailed assessment of the neighborhood environment. Nevertheless, subjective assessments tend to more closely reflect the extent to which people perceive their environment and the reality in which they navigate that environment.

This study included individuals aged ≥65 years who did not require long-term care and residing in 19 municipalities in 9 of the 47 prefectures in Japan. Healthy life expectancy was not found to be associated with the negative aspects of the neighborhood environment, but longer healthy life expectancy was associated with the positive aspect of “access to parks and sidewalks.” Our findings confirm that older people who live closer to parks are also more likely to be physically active. Safe, walkable neighborhoods with excellent parks may promote physical activity among older adults and extend their healthy lifespan.

Article Information

Conflicts of Interest

None

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by Health Labor Sciences Research Grants grant number 22FA1010.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the Health Labor Sciences Research Council for funding this study.

Author Contributions

NK was responsible for acquiring funds. RH and TO were responsible for the research design and investigation, methodology, resources, software used, validation and visualization of data, and writing the original draft of the manuscript. TO was responsible for supervising the study. NK was responsible for the project administration. TM, JA, KK, and NK were responsible for reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

ORCID iD

Rikuya Hosokawa: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4239-8494

Approval by Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Nihon Fukushi University (approval number: 13-14), Chiba University (approval number: 2493), and National Institute for Longevity Sciences (approval number: 992-3).

References

  1. 1.

    Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186(1):125-45.

  2. 2.

    Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Sarna S, et al. Relationship of leisure-time physical activity and mortality: the Finnish twin cohort. JAMA. 1998;279(6):440-4.

  3. 3.

    Fujita K, Takahashi H, Miura C, et al. Walking and mortality in Japan: the Miyagi Cohort Study. J Epidemiol. 2004;14(Suppl 1):S26-32.

  4. 4.

    Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(Suppl 1):3-63.

  5. 5.

    Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801-9.

  6. 6.

    Adami PE, Negro A, Lala N, et al. The role of physical activity in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Clin Ter. 2010;161(6):537-41.

  7. 7.

    Ulrich CM, Wiskemann J, Steindorf K. Physiologic and molecular mechanisms linking physical activity to cancer risk and progression. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012;55(1):3-9. German.

  8. 8.

    National Health and Nutrition Survey 2009. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Jul 26]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000000xtwq-img/2r9852000000xu2r.pdf. Japanese.

  9. 9.

    Brown GC. Living too long: the current focus of medical research on increasing the quantity, rather than the quality, of life is damaging our health and harming the economy. EMBO Rep. 2015;16(2):137-41.

  10. 10.

    Brayne C. The elephant in the room - healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(3):233-9.

  11. 11.

    Healthy Japan 21 (2nd edition). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 26]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/kenkou/kenkounippon21.html. Japanese.

  12. 12.

    Barnett DW, Barnett A, Nathan A, et al. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):103.

  13. 13.

    Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, et al. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4):S99-123.

  14. 14.

    Duncan MJ, Spence JC, Mummery WK. Perceived environment and physical activity: a meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:11.

  15. 15.

    Kondo K. Progress in aging epidemiology in Japan: the JAGES Project. J Epidemiol. 2016;26(7):331-6.

  16. 16.

    Kondo K, Rosenberg M. Advancing universal health coverage through knowledge translation for healthy ageing: lessons learnt from the Japan gerontological evaluation study. World Health Organization [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 26]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/279010.

  17. 17.

    Watanabe M, Shobugawa Y, Tashiro A, et al. Association between neighborhood environment and quality of sleep in older adult residents living in Japan: the JAGES 2010 cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1398.

  18. 18.

    Cai L, Hayward MD, Saito Y, et al. Estimation of multi-state life table functions and their variability from complex survey data using the SPACE program. Demogr Res. 2010;22(6):129-58.

  19. 19.

    Tsutsui T, Muramatsu N. Japan’s universal long-term care system reform of 2005: containing costs and realizing a vision. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(9):1458-63.

  20. 20.

    Long-term care insurance system of Japan. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf. Japanese.

  21. 21.

    Kärmeniemi M, Lankila T, Ikäheimo T, et al. The built environment as a determinant of physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(3):239-51.

  22. 22.

    Hanibuchi T, Kawachi I, Nakaya T, et al. Neighborhood built environment and physical activity of Japanese older adults: results from the Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study (AGES). BMC Public Health. 2011;11:657.

Supplement

PAGE TOP