Case Report

Hybrid Surgery for Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report

Ryota Sasaki, Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Ayumi Takahashi, Kanako Okazaki, Yutaro Kurihara, and Yasushi Asari
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan

Corresponding author: Takaaki Maruhashi, tmaruhasi119@gmail.com

DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0305

Received: October 7, 2024
Accepted: December 2, 2024
Advance Publication: February 7, 2025
Published: April 28, 2025

Cite this article as:
Sasaki R, Maruhashi T, Oi M, Takahashi A, Okazaki K, Kurihara Y, Asari Y. Hybrid Surgery for Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report. JMA J. 2025;8(2):633-636.

Abstract

Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (SMVT) is a rare condition characterized by thrombus formation in the superior mesenteric vein. SMVT is generally caused by abnormal blood coagulation, inflammation, or surgical interventions. This condition can lead to intestinal ischemia and necrosis due to blood flow stasis.

We report the case of a man in his 60s who presented with abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows a thrombus in the portal and superior mesenteric veins, and reduced contrast in the small intestine. Approximately 1.5 m of the necrotic jejunum was resected, an open management approach was undertaken, and anticoagulation with continuous intravenous heparin was initiated. On the fourth day of treatment, a thrombus was retrieved from the superior mesenteric vein within the main trunk of the portal vein using a stent clot retrieval device. The patient’s bowel edema improved soon thereafter.

This case of SMVT was successfully managed using a hybrid approach of bowel resection and transcatheter thrombus retrieval.

Key words: Acute, Abdomen, Thrombosis, Portal Vein, Mesenteric Veins

Introduction

Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (SMVT) is a rare condition in which a thrombus forms in the superior mesenteric vein because of abnormal blood coagulation, inflammatory disease, or surgery (1). Idiopathic cases of SMVT are particularly uncommon (2). The condition can cause intestinal ischemia and necrosis resulting from blood flow stasis, with an acute mortality rate reported to range from 20% to 32% (1). Here, we present a unique case of idiopathic SMVT presenting with intestinal ischemic necrosis, which was successfully treated using a hybrid surgical approach combining necrotizing bowel resection and endovascular thrombus retrieval therapy under an open abdominal cavity.

Case Report

The patient was a man in his 60s with a history of hypertension and dyslipidemia. He was rushed to our hospital with chief complaints of persistent abdominal pain and vomiting lasting for several days. Upon arrival, he was conscious, with vital signs showing a heart rate of 140 beats/min, blood pressure of 92/52 mmHg, and body temperature of 36.7°C. Blood tests revealed elevated fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, increased D-dimer, and renal dysfunction (Table 1). Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed thrombi in the portal, superior mesenteric, and splenic veins; poor contrast in portions of the small intestine; intestinal tract dilatation with wall edema; and ascites (Figure 1A and 1B). Given the diagnosis of extensive small intestinal necrosis caused by SMVT, emergency laparotomy was performed. The procedure revealed extensive continuous necrosis of approximately 150 cm of the jejunum (Figure 1C). The necrotic intestine was resected; however, due to significant intestinal edema from venous stasis, abdominal closure was challenging. Consequently, open abdomen management was performed without intestinal anastomosis. Postoperatively, anticoagulation therapy with continuous intravenous heparin was initiated. The second surgery on day 3 confirmed the absence of further intestinal necrosis, although mesenteric edema from the residual portal vein thrombus continued to hinder abdominal closure. Therefore, endovascular thrombectomy was performed on day 4 of treatment. The superior mesenteric vein was punctured under an open abdomen. Attempts at catheter aspiration failed to remove the thrombus. Therefore, a stent-type thrombus retrieval device (Trevo NXT ProVue Retriever 6 mm; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was used off-label for portal vein thrombosis. The proposed method retrieved a significant amount of thrombi. Subsequent contrast imaging revealed a residual thrombus in the portal vein, prompting the transcatheter intraportal administration of urokinase (Figure 2A and 2B).

Table 1. Blood Test Findings upon Patient Arrival at Our Hospital.

Complete blood count Chemistry
WBC 34.5 × 103 /μL Alb 2.3 g/dL
RBC 4.13 × 106 /μL BUN 66.6 mg/dL
Hb 12.9 g/dL Cre 4.76 mg/dL
Plt 37.3 × 104 /μL AST 15 U/L
Coagulation ALT 11 U/L
PT 18.5 sec ALP 91 U/L
APTT 39.1 sec CK 315 U/L
FDP 45.5 mg/mL CK-MB 5 U/L
D-dimer 13.6 μg/mL Na 130 mEq/L
AT-Ⅲ 73 % K 3.5 mEq/L
Arterial blood gas (4L/min oxygenation) Cl 93 mEq/L
pH 7.38 Ca 7.5 mg/dL
pO2 219.3 mm Hg CRP 23.93 mg/dL
pCO2 40 mm Hg protein C activity 62 %
HCO3 23.1 mmol/L protein S activity 65 %
Lac 15.9 mg/dL HIT antibody (-)
WBC: White blood cell count, RBC: Red blood cell count, Hb: Hemoglobin, Plt: platelets, PT: Prothrombin time, APTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time, FDP: Fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, ATⅢ: Antithrombin Ⅲ, Lac: Lactate, Alb: Albumin, BUN: Blood urea nitrogen, Cr: Creatinine, AST: Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase, CK: Creatine kinase, CK-MB: Creatine kinase MB, Na: Natrium, K: Kalium, Cl: Chlorine, Ca: Calcium, CRP: C-reactive protein, HIT: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Figure 1. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images upon arrival and intraoperative findings.
(A) Coronal view showing an extensive thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein (arrowhead).
(B) A poor contrast area within a section of the small intestine accompanied by intestinal wall edema and thickening (circles).
(C) Intraoperative findings showing bloody ascites, extensive necrosis of approximately 150 cm of the jejunum, and mesenteric edema.
Figure 2. Endovascular thrombectomy of the portal vein.
(A1) Superior mesenteric venography shows a diffuse contrast defect. (A2) Thrombus removal from the portal vein using a stent retriever (arrowhead). (A3) Confirmatory portography showing improved blood flow, with residual thrombus remaining.
(B) The large thrombus volume is removed using the stent retriever.

During the second-look surgery on day 3, small intestinal anastomosis was completed. Following endovascular treatment, the intestinal tract and mesenteric edema gradually subsided (Figure 3), allowing for abdominal closure on day 11. Follow-up CT on day 42 revealed near-complete resolution of the portal vein thrombus. The patient was then transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation on day 46.

Figure 3. Bowel findings before and after thrombus retrieval.
Condition of the open abdominal wound: (A) day 4, (B) day 6, and (C) day 11.
Intestinal edema progressively improved, allowing for staged closure of the laparotomy wound.
(D) Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT on day 42, showing resolution of the intraportal thrombus (arrowhead).

Discussion

In this case, the patient had no history of thrombogenic predispositions or underlying conditions that could induce a hypercoagulable state, recent surgery, trauma, or infection. In addition, coagulation tests revealed no abnormalities in factors such as protein C and S. Thus, SMVT was considered idiopathic.

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend immediate anticoagulation therapy and emergency surgery if intestinal necrosis is suspected upon the diagnosis of SMVT (3). If the thrombus-involved intestine remains, there is a risk of suture failure and recurrence (4). Moreover, extensive intestinal resection can cause short-bowel syndrome. To minimize necrosis, the ESVS guidelines also recommend direct incision of the portal vein to remove thrombi in patients with SMVT (3). However, endovascular thrombectomy was selected in this case due to the risk of bleeding associated with septic shock and the incision of the portal vein. The disadvantages of endovascular thrombectomy in the superior mesenteric vein include the high risk of bleeding with the percutaneous transhepatic portal vein approach (5). Direct puncture of the superior mesenteric vein may be a feasible approach for thrombus removal.

Although endovascular thrombectomy is often performed using a thrombus aspiration catheter, stent-type thrombectomy devices (stent retrievers) are also used in cerebrovascular interventions. These devices use a mesh tubular metal that entangles a blood clot when deployed from the catheter tip in the blood vessel, facilitating the removal of larger thrombi (6). Two factors likely contributed to incomplete thrombus removal in this case. First, only a 6.5-mm stent diameter was available. Second, veins contain fewer elastic fibers, making stent expansion difficult due to poor adhesion to the vessel wall. In other settings, large-diameter thrombus retrieval devices, such as the Flowtriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, California), have been successfully used for pulmonary artery thromboembolism (7). In the future, these new devices with adequate stent diameters and materials that can be deployed and crimped to the vessel wall are expected to improve thrombectomy results in patients with SMVT.

Endovascular thrombectomy may be an effective approach for preventing intestinal necrosis in patients with SMVT.

Article Information

Conflicts of Interest

None

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp) for their assistance with the English language review.

Author Contributions

Writing―original draft preparation, R.S. and M.O.; data curation, A.T. and K.O.; writing―review and editing, T.M. and Y.K.; supervision, Y.A. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Approval by Institutional Review Board (IRB)

The nature of this report was exempted from the requirement for institutional review board approval.

Informed Consent

Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

References

  1. 1.

    Rabuffi P, Vagnarelli S, Bruni A, et al. Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for acute symptomatic superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(1):46-54.

  2. 2.

    Stancu B, Chira A, Coman HF, et al. Intestinal obstruction as the initial presentation of idiopathic portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and literature review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(3):304.

  3. 3.

    Demelo-Rodríguez P, Ordieres-Ortega L, Oblitas CM, et al. Mesenteric venous thrombosis. Med Clin (Barc). 2023;160(9):400-6.

  4. 4.

    Nakamoto H, Yokota R, Namba H, et al. Effectiveness of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence-navigated surgery for superior mesenteric vein thrombosis during treatment for intravascular lymphoma: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e929549.

  5. 5.

    Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, et al. Portal vein embolization before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: current technique and review of 494 consecutive embolizations. Dig Surg. 2012;29(1):23-9.

  6. 6.

    Van Voorst H, Bruggeman AAE, Andriessen J, et al. Prognostic value of thrombus volume and its interaction with first-line endovascular treatment device choice. Stroke. 2023;54(4):1056-65.

  7. 7.

    Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(9):859-69.

PAGE TOP