Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Admission to the Rehabilitation Hospital.

From: Association between Undernutrition at Admission and Improvement in Balance Function Post-stroke

Overall Undernutrition group Intact nutrition group p-value
(n = 304) (n = 114) (n = 190)
Age, years 79.2 ± 8.1 81.5 ± 8.0 77.9 ± 7.9 <0.001
Sex, n (%) 0.403
 Men 173 (56.9) 61 (53.5) 112 (58.9)
 Women 131 (43.1) 53 (46.5) 78 (41.1)
Type of stroke, n (%) 0.001
 Lacunar infarction 89 (29.3) 23 (20.3) 66 (34.7)
 Atherothrombotic cerebral infarction 164 (53.9) 61 (53.5) 103 (54.2)
 Cardiogenic cerebral embolism 51 (16.8) 30 (26.3) 21 (11.1)
History of stroke, n (%) 92 (30.3) 41 (36.0) 51 (26.8) 0.096
History of fracture, n (%) 42 (13.8) 25 (21.9) 17 (8.9) 0.002
BMI, kg/m2 23.6 ± 3.8 22.2 ± 3.4 24.5 ± 3.8 <0.001
MNA-SF score, points 8 [6-10] 7 [5-8.8] 9 [7-10] <0.001
Days from onset to rehabilitation hospital, days 23.0 ± 20.6 27.0 ± 20.2 20.7 ± 20.6 0.010
NIHSS score, points 5 [2-11] 8 [4-14] 4 [2-8] <0.001
BBS score, points 23.7 ± 18.8 16.0 ± 17.1 28.3 ± 18.4 <0.001
FIM score, points 58.2 ± 21.7 46.0 ± 20.3 65.6 ± 19.0 <0.001
Table 2. Nutritional Assessment of GLIM Criteria Sub-Items at Admission.

From: Association between Undernutrition at Admission and Improvement in Balance Function Post-stroke

Overall Undernutrition group Intact nutrition group p-value
Phenotypic criteria, n (%)
 Weight loss
  >5% within past 6 months 70 (23.0) 48 (42.1) 22 (11.6) <0.001
  >10% beyond 6 months 16 (5.3) 10 (8.8) 6 (3.2) 0.060
 Low BMI
  <20 kg/m2 if <70 years 5 (10.0) 4 (33.3) 1 (2.6) 0.009
  <22 kg/m2 if ≥70 years 84 (33.1) 47 (46.1) 37 (24.3) <0.001
 Reduced muscle mass
  Men 111 (64.2) 55 (90.2) 56 (50.0) <0.001
  Women 93 (71.0) 52 (98.1) 41 (52.6) <0.001
Etiologic criteria, n (%)
 Reduced food intake or assimilation 85 (28.0) 79 (69.3) 6 (3.2) <0.001
 Disease burden/inflammatory condition 68 (22.4) 58 (50.9) 10 (5.3) <0.001
Table 3. Outcomes at Hospital Discharge.

From: Association between Undernutrition at Admission and Improvement in Balance Function Post-stroke

Overall Undernutrition group Intact nutrition group p-value
Length of hospital stay, days 82.1 ± 40.6 88.0 ± 41.2 78.5 ± 39.9 0.048
Rehabilitation volume, min/day 137.5 ± 20.7 136.1 ± 21.8 138.3 ± 20.0 0.372
BBS score, points 34.1 ± 19.5 24.2 ± 19.6 40.0 ± 16.9 <0.001
Change in the BBS score, points* 10.4 ± 10.8 8.1 ± 8.8 11.7 ± 11.7 0.005
FIM score, points 86.5 ± 31.2 70.3 ± 31.7 96.2 ± 26.6 <0.001
Change in the FIM score, points 28.3 ± 15.9 24.3 ± 16.1 30.7 ± 15.4 0.001
Table 4. Comparison of BBS and FIM between on Admission and at Discharge.

From: Association between Undernutrition at Admission and Improvement in Balance Function Post-stroke

On admission At discharge p-value
BBS score, points 23.7 ± 18.8 34.1 ± 19.5 <0.001
 Undernutrition group 16.0 ± 17.1 24.2 ± 19.6 <0.001
 Intact nutrition group 28.3 ± 18.4 40.0 ± 16.9 <0.001
FIM score, points 58.2 ± 21.7 86.5 ± 31.2 <0.001
 Undernutrition group 46.0 ± 20.3 70.3 ± 31.7 <0.001
 Intact nutrition group 65.6 ± 19.0 96.2 ± 26.6 <0.001
PAGE TOP