Review Article

Appropriate Support for “Specified Expectant Mothers”

Shunji Suzuki
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Corresponding author: Shunji Suzuki,

DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0165

Received: August 27, 2021
Accepted: September 28, 2021
Advance Publication: December 8, 2021
Published: January 17, 2022

Cite this article as:
Suzuki S. Appropriate Support for “Specified Expectant Mothers”. JMA J. 2022;5(1):17-22.


“Specified expectant mothers” are defined as pregnant women at high risk of needing extra support after birth. To provide them appropriate support, the methods for evaluating specified expectant mothers should be standardized. Thus, in this study, I reviewed the evaluation and multidisciplinary collaboration in some regions reported to be actively supporting specified expectant mothers in Japan. The main items related to “specified expectant mothers” were as follows: (1) mental disorders, (2) younger age, (3) no consultation/late first visit, (4) poverty, and (5) multiple pregnancy. It is important to proactively identify and confirm the problems faced by pregnant women through screening and interviews conducted by the medical staff.

Key words: appropriate support, assessment sheet, specified expectant mothers, Japan


In 2010, “specified expectant mothers” have been defined by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as pregnant women at high risk of abuse and/or in need of extra support after birth because of some social problems such as unstable income, mental disorders, etc (1). For example, in our institute, which is one of the main Japanese perinatal centers (about 1,700 deliveries recorded per year) located in the downtown area of Tokyo, at least 200 specified expectant mothers are managed per year (2). In our institute, “specified expectant mothers” are recognized according to the criteria devised by myself to support their social problems through multidisciplinary collaboration including regional administrative staff. In our earlier study (3), for example, to quantitatively clarify the mental vulnerabilities of “specified expectant mothers,” they were observed at 1 month after delivery using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

In most obstetric institutions in Japan, pregnant women are often asked by regional administrative staff about their living environment using individual evaluation sheets at their first visits (4). On the other hand, in most municipalities in Japan, most women visiting to register for their pregnancies are screened by midwives or nurses for their social problems using an individual screening/assessment sheet (5). However, the objective methods of assessment and/or criteria for their problems have not been set clearly at many municipalities and institutions (4), (5).

To provide appropriate support to specified pregnant women, the methods for evaluation should thus be standardized. Therefore, we reviewed the actual situation of the evaluation and multidisciplinary collaboration in some regions reported to be actively supporting these group of pregnant women in Japan.

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital (K2021-18). Informed consent concerning retrospective analyses was obtained from all subjects.

Screening Tools for “Specified Expectant Mothers”

First, we examined the common items used in the screening sheets throughout Japan to determine and identify “specified expectant mothers.” Based on the status of some domestic workshops and/or academic conference reports investigated in the first and second editions of the ‘Perinatal Mental Health Care Manual’ published by the Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (6), (7), (8), seven screening sheets created by five areas/institutes, other than our department and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, were included for examination. We have confirmed that these five areas/institutes are actively working to support specified expectant mothers, as we searched the terms “specified expectant mothers” and “assessment or support” in the Japan Medical Abstracts Society (

Table 1 summarizes the seven screening sheets used for “specified expectant mothers.” The number of items to be checked was 6 to 26, which was different for each sheet. The following items have been listed in at least six of the seven sheets: (1) mental disorders, (2) younger age, (3) no consultation/late first visit, (4) poverty, and (5) multiple (twin) pregnancy.

Table 1. Items to Extract “Specified Expectant Mothers” in the Screening Sheets Used in Eight Institutes in Japan.

Area where the institute is located
Associated factors for “specified expectant mothers” Japan North-Tokyo South-Tokyo Osaka Fukuoka Oita Okinawa
Mental disorders
Physical diseases
Extreme thinking
Difficulty in communication
Aggressive personality
History of abuse
History of being abused
Younger age
Older age
Desire for career advancement
No consultation/late first visit
Lack of support
Family requiring nursing care/medical treatment
Unhoped pregnancy
No notification
Multiple (twin) pregnancy
Fetal anomaly
In vitro fertilization
Screening of bonding
Screening for depression
〇:item listed in the sheet.

The first four factors are examined as serious risk factors for inappropriate childcare from inside and/or outside Japan (1), (2), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13). These factors have been observed to be more complex and are likely to occur in duplicate than they occur alone (14). They may be urge to receive not only medical and psychological care but also age-specific care. On the other hand, child-rearing difficulty of multiple (twins) pregnancy has been pointed out (15).

First Support for “Specified Expectant Mothers”

To date, in our institute, we have supported their problems mainly through our multidisciplinary collaboration composed of midwives, clinical psychologists, medical social workers, medical treasurers, and regional administrative staff (2), (13), (16). For example, clinical psychologists evaluate the mental status and give advice on how to get referred to psychiatrists and/or regional staff. The medical social workers provide support and information on social resources available and serve as contact points for regional organizations. The information as regards this group of pregnant women is then shared, wherein opinions are exchanged from each specialized area, and support methods are decided.

Hereafter, the outlines of the specific support for each problem based on literature considerations are put forward.

1) Mental disorders

Recently, perinatal mental disorders have become a significant complication of pregnancy, in particular in the postpartum period (17). Perinatal mental disorders impair a woman’s function and are associated with the suboptimal development of her children. Perinatal mental healthcare is thus required for the emotional well-being of a pregnant woman and her children, partner, and family members. The early detection and effective management of perinatal mental disorders are critical for the welfare of a woman and her children (18). For example, women who receive appropriate psychosocial or psychological intervention have been observed to be significantly less likely to develop postpartum depression compared with those receiving standard care (18). There may be a number of steps in perinatal psychosocial or psychological intervention that help a pregnant woman to get her emotions in check during pregnancy and after childbirth. Promising interventions include the provision of intensive, professionally based postpartum home visits, telephone-based peer support, and interpersonal psychotherapy.

Recently, some clinical guides for women with mental health problems during the perinatal period have been published to facilitate healthy pregnancies and childbirth (7), (19), (20). Based on the guidelines, it should be noted that a woman’s physical conditions change significantly during pregnancy due to changes in maternal circulating blood volume and hormones; moreover, use of pharmaceutical products among pregnant women should be prohibited as it can affect the child, depending on the stage of pregnancy (19). Clinical evidence on the safety of psychotropic medicines during the perinatal period remains limited; however, the incidence of deterioration/relapse of mental disorders has been noted to be higher in women who discontinued their medications for their mental health problem regardless of doctor’s discretion or self-interruption compared to women who continued their medications during pregnancy. Therefore, the continuation of medications and careful observation should be required for pregnant women complicated by mental disorders (21).

In recent years, some insurance listings and subsidies have been newly established on the premise of medical cooperation between obstetricians and psychiatrists and/or support by multidisciplinary cooperation. Moreover, the mental healthcare of pregnant women in obstetric facilities has become a public demand (7), (22). These are based on the awareness that the government, which had been waiting for consultations and support requests from pregnant women, can actively reach out to pregnant women who need support. In particular, the prevalence of perinatal depression has been observed to be as high as 10-15 %, and it may be unrealistic to refer all of them to psychiatry. Most perinatal depression seems to be mild and is associated with some obvious social factors during pregnancy and postpartum, and it will be improved by solving them (7), (22). Considering the long-term support, it will be desirable for them to be managed in an accessible maternity facility near their home.

2) Younger age

Some previous studies have reported that pregnancy at younger age is a risk factor for premature delivery and neonatal hospitalization; (23) however, almost all observations have suggested its low medical risk (16), (24), (25).

In our previous studies (16), (24), there were some cases with first perinatal visit after 22 weeks’ gestation, unknown partners, and/or economic problems in younger aged pregnancy. In Japan, when a minor gives birth without marriage, the parental authority of the neonate is legally required by the parents of the woman. Therefore, it is important to have a relationship between the younger aged women and their parents for pregnancy and childcare. However, in some cases, the relationships are not good, and we sometimes cannot even contact their parents. It is feared that delaying consultation due to economic problems and/or being unable to consult with their families while on pregnancy may lead to delays in required medical and/or social supports.

In addition, although there were some cases of marriage with their partners after delivery, the divorce rate in women under the age of 19 has been reported to be as high as 60 % in Japan (26). If young women without special skills become child caregivers alone, this will only add further distress on their lives. Therefore, independent financial and social support coming from welfare offices, visits and telephone guidance by public health nurses, and group support by public health centers and/or health centers is needed for young aged pregnancy, especially after delivery.

3) No consultation/late first visit

The increased number of pregnant women without prenatal care has become a serious problem in Japan. The unpreparedness of women for their upcoming deliveries does not only affect themselves but also their fetuses. The situation also may create a huge burden for the obstetric institutes.

The main reasons leading to no prenatal visit have been reported to be as follows: economic problems, unaware of pregnancy, unable to consult with anyone, and due to being busy. Recently, cases with complex home environment (unaware of pregnancy and having no one to consult with) have been noted to increase (27). In these cases, it is necessary to identify the real problems in these situations and take measures to prevent their social isolation. Recent changes in family forms and communication methods such as social networking service (SNS) might have contributed to the isolated situation of a pregnant woman. Thus, various social support using SNS should be publicized to all non-pregnant and pregnant women. In addition, “being busy” and “ignoring pregnancy” may suggest the lacking awareness on the possible risks of pregnancy and delivery. Therefore, the support required by women without prenatal care may be the improvement of the negative effects of a complex home environment rather than economic support.

4) Poverty

In Japan, the hospitalization assistance policy (HAP) system, based on the Child Welfare Act, has already assisted a number of pregnant women who cannot give birth at medical institutions for economic reasons (28). In this HAP system, women were allowed to deliver at specified (midwifery) institutions. The main objective of this system is to help pregnant women receive livelihood protection, as they are unable to maintain minimum living standards because of poverty, live in households exempt from the residence tax, and live in households in which the income tax is less than about 100 US dollars per year.

However, unfortunately, there have been some underage and/or non-Japanese women who are not aware of this system or specified midwifery institutions (29). They were usually refused medical examinations and treatments at some non-specified midwifery institutions for economic reasons without being informed of the HAP system.

However, women who actually need social supports are those with minimum income that does not meet the subsidy criteria of the HAP system. Without financial support, pregnant women will not be able to afford quality healthcare they deserve. These are often pregnant women who have escaped the violence of their earning husbands. We sometimes have offered installments of their delivery costs; however, it will not be possible at all facilities.

5) Multiple (twin) pregnancy

Some mothers with multiple (twins) pregnancy have been pointed out to have a strong sense of child-rearing difficulty associated with delayed childhood development and be mentally cornered with respect to child-rearing (15). In an earlier study by Yokoyama et al. (30), multiples and their mothers had a higher rate of risk factors for child maltreatment such as low birth weight and neural abnormality. In addition, compared with mothers of singleton, mothers of twins are often more prone to developing poor health. Recent Japanese nationwide data have suggested that the non-specific overburden of child-rearing might be one possible reason for higher frequency of child maltreatment for multiples compared with singletons, and parental comparisons between two twins might be another (31). In cases of twins with a considerable difference in birth weights, it has been reported that stunted infants tend to be the target of abuse (32).

Parenting multiples is deemed very a difficult task; however, appropriate support to these mothers has remained scarce. Mothers who carry out multiple births have been gaining attention from society every time an abuse case occurs, thus revealing the difficult situation of parenting multiples. However, further elucidation of the fact that difficult childcare is not limited to multiple births has not been widespread (33), (34).

For parenting multiples, it is important to have family members who understand the difficulty of raising multiple children and lend their help when needed (33). Moreover, support from midwives and public health nurses during pregnancy and postpartum has been also suggested to be indispensable. In addition, having a circle of members who also experienced multiple births has been found to be really encouraging for them. However, there are now regional disparities in support for multiple births depending on the presence or absence of a regional multiple birth network and/or circle.


In this study, we reviewed the main risk factors requiring social supports assumed in multiple regions; however, there have not been any criteria for how many items should be considered as high risk. These risks have been inconsistent in different parts of Japan (4), (35), (36). They also have depended on the environments in which the woman was raised. Examining the current situation nationwide, however, there are some areas where the hurdles for designation as “specified expectant mothers” are very high. Although they have been only expected with child-rearing difficulties after birth, they may be misunderstood as they are designated as “preliminary women for child abuse” (37). We understand that fetuses of “specified expectant mothers” may be affected by epigenetic factors, but we cannot deny the possibility that early postnatal growth environment can significantly affect subsequent growth.

Therefore, appropriate support necessary for the mother should be considered if she has even one risk factor.


First of all, it is important to earn the trust of a pregnant woman and their family so that they can express their feelings honestly and inform us actively when there is danger in terms of raising their children.

For women, pregnancy may be an opportunity to recognize the potential problems women have, review their lifestyles, and receive medical treatment for long life vision. To determine “what should be done for the health of the mother and their children,” it is important to proactively confirm the problems faced by a pregnant woman via screening and interviews conducted by the medical staff, especially for “specified expectant mothers.”

Article Information

Conflicts of Interest


Author Contributions

Shunji Suzuki: all project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Approval by Institutional Review Board (IRB)

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital (K2021-18).

Informed Consent

Patients’ informed consent for publication of this report was obtained


  1. 1.

    Parenting Support Visit Business Guideline [Internet]. Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  2. 2.

    Suzuki S, Eto M. Current status of social problems during pregnancy at a Perinatal Center in Japan. JMA J. 2020;3(4):307-12.

  3. 3.

    Kurashina R, Suzuki S. Postpartum mental status in women with social problems at a Japanese perinatal center. Hypertens Res Preg. 2021 in press.

  4. 4.

    Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal mental health care under COVID-19 pandemic. JAOG News. 2020;72(8):12-3. Japanese.

  5. 5.

    Mitsuda N. Research on the construction of a health/medical cooperation system for understanding and seamlessly supporting high-risk pregnant women [Internet]. Tokyo [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  6. 6.

    Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. MCMC (Mental-health Care for Mother and Child) [Internet]. Tokyo [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  7. 7.

    Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal Mental Health Care Manual [Internet]. Tokyo [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  8. 8.

    Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Revised Version of Perinatal Mental Health Care Manual. 2021 in press. Japanese.

  9. 9.

    Lazzerini M, Richardson S, Ciardelli V, et al. Effectiveness of the facility-based maternal near-miss case reviews in improving maternal and newborn quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e019787.

  10. 10.

    Malamitsi-Puchner A, Boutsikou T. Adolescent pregnancy and perinatal outcome. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2006;3(Suppl 1):170-1.

  11. 11.

    Males M. School-age pregnancy: why hasn't prevention worked? J Sch Health. 1993;63(10):429-32.

  12. 12.

    Suzuki S. [Pregnancy complicated by mental disorders managed at our hospital]. Perinat Med (Tokyo). 2014;44(3):397-400. Japanese.

  13. 13.

    Suzuki S. Clinical significance of pregnancy in adolescence in Japan. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(11):1864-8.

  14. 14.

    Matoba Y, Saito E. [Health status and support needs of low-income people admitted to supportive housing in urban areas of Japan: research on new residents across several age groups]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2019;66(12):767-77. Japanese.

  15. 15.

    Nishihara R, Hattori R, Kobayashi Y, et al. [Parenting anxiety and childhood development of twins as compared to singletons]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2006;53(11):831-41. Japanese.

  16. 16.

    Suzuki S. Recent status of pregnant women with mental disorders at a Japanese perinatal center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(11):2131-5.

  17. 17.

    O’Hara MW, Wisner KL. Perinatal mental illness: definition, description and aetiology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):3-12.

  18. 18.

    Dennis CL, Dowswell T. Psychosocial and psychological interventions for preventing postpartum depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2(2):CD001134.

  19. 19.

    Clinical Guide for Women with Mental Health Problems during the Perinatal Period [Internet]. Tokyo: The Japanese Society of Psychiatry & Neurology. [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  20. 20.

    Consensus Guide for Perinatal Mental Health [Internet]. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Perinatal Mental Health. [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  21. 21.

    Suzuki S, Kato M. Deterioration/relapse of depression during pregnancy in Japanese women associated with interruption of antidepressant medications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(10):1129-32.

  22. 22.

    Suzuki S. [Multidisciplinary cooperation in perinatal mental health]. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;71(4):593-8. Japanese.

  23. 23.

    Santos RS. [Pregnancy in adolescent mothers. Study in the district of Beja 1986-1991]. Acta Med Port. 1997;10(10):681-8. Portuguese.

  24. 24.

    Suzuki S, Hiraizumi Y, Miyake H, et al. [Perinatal outcomes of younger aged pregnancy under 16 years old]. Perinat Med (Tokyo). 2011;41:1637-41. Japanese.

  25. 25.

    Suzuki S. [Investigation of teenagers giving birth without visiting antenatal clinics]. Med Assoc Nippon Med Sch. 2015;11(2):102-4. Japanese.

  26. 26.

    “Vital Statistics” [Internet]. Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  27. 27.

    Shinmasu Y, Sakasegawa M, Morikawa M, et al. [A review of the literature on factors and reasons why some pregnant women do not have prenatal care]. Nurs J Osaka Aoyama Univ. 2020;3:11-9. Japanese.

  28. 28.

    The hospitalization assistance policy system [Internet]. Tokyo: Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  29. 29.

    Hiraizumi Y, Suzuki S. The hospitalization assistance policy system in Japan. J Nippon Med Sch. 2011;78(4):267-9.

  30. 30.

    Yokoyama Y, Oda T, Nagai N, et al. Child maltreatment among singletons and multiple births in Japan: a population-based study. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2015;18(6):806-11.

  31. 31.

    Ooki S. Characteristics of fatal child maltreatment associated with multiple births in Japan. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16(3):743-50.

  32. 32.

    Suzuki I. [Characteristics of multiple pregnancies and problems related to motherhood]. Child Health. 2005;8(11):837-40. Japanese.

  33. 33.

    “Are there many cases of abusive death in multiple or multiple birth families?” 2013.7.2 [Internet]. Tokyo: Japan Multiple Births Association. [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  34. 34.

    JpMBA publication [Internet]. Tokyo: Japan Multiple Births Association [cited 2021 Jun 26]. Available from: Japanese.

  35. 35.

    Kawabuchi K. [The issue of disparity and healthcare]. J Clin Exp Med. 2014;248(11):867-72. Japanese.

  36. 36.

    Yamagata Z. [Comprehensive support centers for families with children]. Child Health. 2021;24(3):192-6. Japanese.

  37. 37.

    Mitsuda N. [What is ‘specified expectant mother’?]. J Jp Soc Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2018;20(3):289-93. Japanese.